That Awful Mess on the Via Merulana
by Carlo Emilio Gadda, introduction by Italo Calvino, translated from the Italian by William Weaver
In a large apartment house in central Rome, two crimes are committed within a matter of days: a burglary, in which a good deal of money and precious jewels are taken, and a murder, as a young woman whose husband is out of town is found with her throat cut. Called in to investigate, melancholy Detective Ciccio, a secret admirer of the murdered woman and a friend of her husband’s, discovers that almost everyone in the apartment building is somehow involved in the case, and with each new development the mystery only deepens and broadens. Gadda’s sublimely different detective story presents a scathing picture of fascist Italy while tracking the elusiveness of the truth, the impossibility of proof, and the infinite complexity of the workings of fate, showing how they come into conflict with the demands of justice and love.
Italo Calvino, Pier Paolo Pasolini, and Alberto Moravia all considered That Awful Mess on the Via Merulana to be the great modern Italian novel. Unquestionably, it is a work of universal significance and protean genius: a rich social novel, a comic opera, an act of political resistance, a blazing feat of baroque wordplay, and a haunting story of life and death.carlo emilio gadda italo calvino
I take Carlo Emilio Gadda to be a vituoso of philosophic fiction fully comprable to Broch and to Musil.
— George Steiner, in "An Exact Art"
The novel...is now considered a classic by modern Italian novelists, who especially admire its street language...from his thrusts against the dictator in this powerful novel, Gadda might be considered an early anti-Fascist.
— The New York Times
...[A] prize-winning look at a slice of bureaucratic society in Rome in 1927.
— The Christian Science Monitor
...[W]e are left with something possibly quite wonderful...[Gadda] and his book achieve a species of luminescence—perhaps phosphorescence...complex and truly remarkable effects, mimetically, rhetorically, and morally.
— The New York Times